PhishGuard Blueprint

Analyze suspicious emails without making users read mail headers.

PhishGuard turns pasted email text, headers, links, and .eml evidence into a risk score, plain-English explanation, and training-friendly report.

Safety boundary: do not automatically open, crawl, screenshot, or detonate links in the MVP. Parse evidence, defang URLs, warn users not to click, and treat scoring as suspicion guidance rather than proof of maliciousness.

Paste, parse, explain, export

Inputs

Email body, raw headers, copied links, and optional .eml upload. Keep all samples local or clearly mark what is stored.

Outputs

Risk score, sender analysis, link analysis, language pressure, authentication findings, and a simple user recommendation.

Reports

Individual analysis report, team training summary, common red flags, and reusable examples for awareness sessions.

Make the score explainable

Sender

Identity mismatch

Display-name spoofing, reply-to mismatch, free-mail impersonation, suspicious TLD, lookalike domain, and domain mismatch.

Links

Destination risk

Shorteners, punycode, IP address URLs, HTTP links, mismatched anchor text, redirect chains, and suspicious login paths.

Content

Pressure language

Urgency, threat wording, credential request, fake invoice, financial pressure, attachment request, unusual tone, and grammar anomalies.

Headers

Authentication clues

SPF, DKIM, DMARC, return-path mismatch, received-chain surprises, and mail provider warnings.

Keep the MVP safe and useful

Do firstStatic analysis

Parse text, headers, and URLs; defang links; show evidence cards; export a report.

Do laterSandbox links

Only add screenshots or detonation with strong isolation, consent, and abuse controls.

Success metricExplanation quality

A non-technical user can understand why the email is suspicious and what to do next.

MonetizationTeams and training

Paid team dashboard, reporting button, awareness reports, and campaign simulator.

Make the answer useful for a person, not just a score

Executive result

Likely phishing, suspicious, probably safe, or needs review, with a short reason and a recommended action.

Evidence table

Sender, links, language, and authentication clues with matched evidence and confidence notes.

User guidance

Do not click, report to security, verify through another channel, or request helpdesk review.

Training note

Turn the red flags into a reusable awareness example without exposing sensitive mailbox content.